[Bug 1441046] Review Request: swatchbooker - Color swatch editor

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441046



--- Comment #7 from Luya Tshimbalanga <luya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Simone Caronni from comment #5)
> > [!]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
> >      Note: No known owner of /usr/lib/swatchbooker
> > [!]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
> >      Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib/swatchbooker
> 
> > swatchbooker.src:90: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/%{name}/*
> ...(snip)... 
> But you need to make sure that the python files are placed in
> /usr/share/swatchbooker and that the %files section just selects that:
> 
> %{_datadir}/%{name}

Done

> 
> > swatchbooker.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/swatchbook/codecs/ral_bcs.py /usr/bin/env python
> 
> Please fix. You can find an example here:
> 
> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/python-rfc3987.git/tree/python-
> rfc3987.spec#n55

 Looking at the tip part:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_tricks?rd=PackageMaintainers/Packaging_Tricks#Remove_shebang_from_Python_libraries

How to properly substitute "/usr/bin/env python" with "!/usr/bin/python"? I
currently use 

# Remove shebang
for lib in %{buildroot}%{python_sitelib}/swatchbook/*/*.py; do
 sed '1{\@^#!/usr/bin/env python@d}' $lib > $lib.new &&
 touch -r $lib $lib.new &&
 mv $lib.new $lib
done

but rpmlint keeps on complaining 

swatchbooker.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/swatchbook/codecs/ooo_soc.py

> 
> > %global	commit c5c8b021c8f9420c26c11372c95a4a6f440dcc97
> > %global	shortcommit %(c=%{commit}; echo ${c:0:7})
> > %global	date 20170131
> > Release:	0.1%{?date:.%{date}git}%{?dist}
> 
> This does not express the short git commit in the release field:
> 
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Versioning#Snapshots
> 
> Please also use commit0/shortcommit0. For example:
> 
> %global	commit0 c5c8b021c8f9420c26c11372c95a4a6f440dcc97
> %global	shortcommit0 %(c=%{commit0}; echo ${c:0:7})
> %global	date 20170131
> Release: 0.1%{?shortcommit0:.%{date}git%{shortcommit0}}%{?dist}
> 
> You can also check with %{?date} though, like you did.

Done

> 
> Optional:
> 
> 1) Sort BuildRequires, one per line

Done 

> 2) Have you considered building for both Python 2 and 3 in the same SPEC
> file if supported by upstream?

I tried that method which failed due to upstream only using Python 2 therefore
unversionned python macros are a better options as you suggested.


> > swatchbooker.noarch: E: non-executable-script
> /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/swatchbook/codecs/html.py 644 /usr/bin/env
> python
> 
> Sorry, also this, make sure all .py files are 755.

Done

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux