[Bug 1444615] Review Request: python2-ipython - An enhanced interactive Python shell (Python 2 version)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1444615



--- Comment #4 from Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
Several issues found, see bellow:


Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated



===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: IPython/utils/_signatures.py is reported as Apache by licensecheck,
but it is BSD, so that's fine.
[!]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[!]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
     must be documented in the spec.
[-]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
     Note: This is a replacement for python-ipython, so this is happening so
far, but intended.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[-]: Package does not generate any conflict.
     Note: So far it does generate file conflict, but only for python-ipython
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[!]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
     Note: I believe provides and obsoletes for "ipython" are missing.
[!]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
     Note: Use python2-backports-shutil_get_terminal_size, python2-ipython,
python2-jsonschema, python2-path and python2-traitlets in (Build)Requires
instead of python-***; python2-pathlib and python2-mistune are not yet
available, so keep python-*** here
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[?]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
     that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
     process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
     provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[!]: Avoid bundling fonts in non-fonts packages.
     Note: Package contains font files
[*]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[!]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
     Not applicable
[?]: Package functions as described.
[?]: Latest version is packaged.
[!]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[!]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
     justified.
     Note: Add link to Patch0.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[?]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[?]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: python2-ipython-5.3.0-5.fc27.noarch.rpm
          python2-ipython-sphinx-5.3.0-5.fc27.noarch.rpm
          python2-ipython-tests-5.3.0-5.fc27.noarch.rpm
          python2-ipython-doc-5.3.0-5.fc27.noarch.rpm
          python2-ipython-5.3.0-5.fc27.src.rpm
python2-ipython.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pdb -> pd, db,
pub
python2-ipython.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ipython2
python2-ipython-sphinx.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pdb ->
pd, db, pub
python2-ipython-sphinx.noarch: W: no-documentation
python2-ipython-tests.noarch: W: no-documentation
python2-ipython-tests.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary iptest2
python2-ipython-tests.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary iptest
python2-ipython.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pdb -> pd, db, pub
5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 8 warnings.




Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
python2-ipython-sphinx.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
embeddable -> embedded
python2-ipython-sphinx.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pdb ->
pd, db, pub
python2-ipython-sphinx.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US profiler
-> profile, profiles, profiled
python2-ipython-sphinx.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: http://ipython.org/ <urlopen
error [Errno -2] Name or service not known>
python2-ipython-sphinx.noarch: W: no-documentation
python2-ipython.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US embeddable ->
embedded
python2-ipython.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pdb -> pd, db,
pub
python2-ipython.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US profiler ->
profile, profiles, profiled
python2-ipython.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: http://ipython.org/ <urlopen error
[Errno -2] Name or service not known>
python2-ipython.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ipython2
python2-ipython-doc.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: http://ipython.org/ <urlopen
error [Errno -2] Name or service not known>
python2-ipython-tests.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: http://ipython.org/ <urlopen
error [Errno -2] Name or service not known>
python2-ipython-tests.noarch: W: no-documentation
python2-ipython-tests.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary iptest
python2-ipython-tests.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary iptest2
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 15 warnings.

All fine.



Requires
--------
python2-ipython-sphinx (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    python(abi)
    python2-ipython
    python2-sphinx

python2-ipython (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    /usr/bin/python2
    python(abi)
    python-backports-shutil_get_terminal_size
    python-ipython
    python-jsonschema
    python-mistune
    python-path
    python-pathlib
    python-traitlets
    python2-decorator
    python2-pickleshare
    python2-prompt_toolkit
    python2-setuptools
    python2-simplegeneric
    python2-zmq

python2-ipython-doc (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):

python2-ipython-tests (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    /usr/bin/python2
    python(abi)
    python2-ipykernel
    python2-ipython
    python2-jupyter-client
    python2-nbformat
    python2-nose
    python2-pytest
    python2-testpath
    python2-zmq-tests



Provides
--------
python2-ipython-sphinx:
    python-ipython-sphinx
    python2-ipython-sphinx

python2-ipython:
    ipython2
    python-ipython
    python2-ipython
    python2-ipython-console
    python2.7dist(ipython)
    python2dist(ipython)

python2-ipython-doc:
    python-ipython-doc
    python2-ipython-doc

python2-ipython-tests:
    python-ipython-tests
    python2-ipython-tests



Source checksums
----------------
https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/source/i/ipython/ipython-5.3.0.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     :
bf5e615e7d96dac5a61fbf98d9e2926d98aa55582681bea7e9382992a3f43c1d
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package :
bf5e615e7d96dac5a61fbf98d9e2926d98aa55582681bea7e9382992a3f43c1d

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux