[Bug 248407] Review Request: perl-Term-ReadPassword - Asking the user for a password

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-Term-ReadPassword - Asking the user for a password


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248407


rpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




------- Additional Comments From rpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx  2007-07-24 17:07 EST -------
MUST items:
 1. rpmlint is quiet
 2. package named properly
 3. spec filename matches package name
 4. meets packaging guidelines
 5. open source license
 6. license field matches actual license
 7. specfile written in AmE
 8. specfile is legible
 9. sources match upstream:
cc1a611fbb6dfd4d6e96e54434bb20b8  Term-ReadPassword-0.07.tar.gz
10. builds properly on devel/x86_64
11. no ExcludeArch necessary
12. proper BuildRequires
13. doesn't have locales
14. no shared libraries
15. not relocatable
16. owns all directories it creates
17. no duplicates in %files
18. proper file permissions
19. proper %clean section
20. consistent macro usage
21. code, not content
22. no large docs
23. %doc not necessary for runtime operation
24. no headers
25. no static libs
26. no pkgconfig files
27. no libraries with suffix
28. no devel subpackage
29. no .la files
30. no GUI
31. owns directories owned by other packages: perl-Term-ProgressBar,
perl-Term-UI -> we don't have any package owning %{perl_vendorlib}/Term, though,
so this is OK.
32. cleans buildroot in %install
33. filenames are valid UTF-8

SHOULD items:
 1. source package doesn't include any license file, please ask upstream to
include it
 2. no translations of summary/description available
 3. builds in mock/devel/x86_64
 4. noarch package
 5. software works as intended
 6. no scriptlets used
 7. no subpackages
 8. no pkgconfig files
 9. no file dependencies

APPROVED


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]