Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alpine - UW Alpine mail user agent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249365 ------- Additional Comments From jima@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-07-24 17:03 EST ------- I guess I should have publicized my (in-my-spare-time) efforts at packaging Alpine more widely than in #fedora-devel and the alpine-alpha mailing list. :-P It looks like you caught most of the snags I did, but if you want to eyeball my spec, see: http://beer.tclug.org/fedora-extras/alpine/alpine.spec Your rpdoc.patch and my alpine-manpages.patch are effectively identical, I see, aside from the directory name being in mine (necessitating -p1 instead of -p0, big whup). I still hadn't made up my mind about whether the s/%{version}/%{version}-%{release}/ is a good idea. I'd be happy to comaintain Alpine with you, although I can't sponsor you (as I'm not a sponsor). :-( Also, you might want to fix your SRPM link to reflect the dist tag. ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review