[Bug 1428974] Review Request: rgbds - Game Boy development package

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1428974

Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Blocks|                            |182235 (FE-Legal)
              Flags|needinfo?(dlabsky@xxxxxxxxx |
                   |m)                          |



--- Comment #8 from Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to David "Sanqui" Labský from comment #7)
> >Adding an explanation comment (Such as "See LICENSE for details") would be nice.
> Where would this be?  I'm under the impression the License tag should be
> machine-readable.
I meant a # comment above the License tag.


> >Why is the debuginfo package disabled?
> I am getting the following error when I enable debuginfo:
> 
>    error: Empty %files file /builddir/build/BUILD/rgbds-0.2.4/debugfiles.list
>        Empty %files file /builddir/build/BUILD/rgbds-0.2.4/debugfiles.list
> 
> I'm assuming the build process isn't producing sufficient debug information.
> I'll be looking into it further.

Try setting the compiler flags
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Compiler_flags


> >As I understand it, this allows you to create games for the Game Boy? That should be fine. Does it contain any binary blobs or such that might be problematic?
> Games and utilities, correct.  I am aware the rgbfix utility contains a
> small bitmap of the Nintendo logo[0].
> 
> This bitmap must be present in the ROM in order for the console to boot into
> the game.  It is my understanding the presence of the logo, when it's
> required to pass hardware restrictions, is not a trademark violation,
> rather, it deemed fair use in the US (see [1]), but IANAL.
> 
> [0] https://github.com/rednex/rgbds/blob/v0.2.4/src/fix/main.c#L212
> [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sega_v._Accolade

I'm not capable of deciding that. Setting to block FE-Legal and will ask on the
mailing list.


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=182235
[Bug 182235] Fedora Legal Tracker
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]