https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419122 --- Comment #12 from Sascha Spreitzer <sspreitz@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Hi Simone > fedora-review is "smart enough" to actually get the links in the last comment > in which they are available, you don't need to make sure they are in the last > comment before the actual fedora-review process. I had to add the link as fedora-review could not extract the raw/plain version from the provided link. > Actually you need to make sure that the license is available in any package > installation combination. So judging by a quick look from the spec file, the > -doc subpackage requires the main package to be installed, so the license is > enough to be available in the main package as it is always installed when -doc > is. Sounds good to me then. > PS: I'm not watching you, but when you sponsor someone you are notified of the > Bugzilla actions of the person you've sponsored :P All input that makes Fedora a good Linux distribution is very welcome! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx