https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1406786 Christos Triantafyllidis <christos.triantafyllidis@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(christos.triantaf | |yllidis@xxxxxxxxx) | --- Comment #4 from Christos Triantafyllidis <christos.triantafyllidis@xxxxxxxxx> --- Thank you Ricardo, Updated SRPM: https://ctria.fedorapeople.org/packaging/configsnap/configsnap-0.11-2.fc25.src.rpm Updated SPEC: https://ctria.fedorapeople.org/packaging/configsnap/configsnap.spec Included patch (as I don't think that needs to go to upstream, that is a Fedora implementation issue): https://ctria.fedorapeople.org/packaging/configsnap/python_executable.patch On your comments: [!]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. Correct, changed! [!]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python Correct, changed! [?] - getData script provided by upstream is not included. I understand that its purpose is limited as it only serves to warn the user that the script has been renamed to configsnap. I guess you've not included it by design, although, if included, /usr/bin/getdata would not collide with any current packages on Fedora, RHEL and EPEL repositories. Please confirm that this was done by design. That is done by design that was added as part of the deprecation of the old project name. There is no need to introduce this in Fedora/EPEL. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx