https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359914 --- Comment #22 from Jeremy Newton <alexjnewt@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Cédric Bellegarde from comment #21) > lollypop-portal is a separate source, you will be forced to package it as a > separate package. > > DBus portal is not part of lollypop because it can't be part of flatpak > package. That shouldn't be necessary; RPM allows for multiple sources. As long Martin makes sure the lollypop-portal files only make it into the "portal" subpackage, this should work as intended. Even if the user prefers to install the flatpak, they should be able to just install the lollypop-portal package without requiring the lollypop package. This is because the lollypop package should require lollypop-portal but not the other way around. With that said, it's ultimately Martin's choice how he wishes to package it. Ultimately either decision is fine by me. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx