https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398400 --- Comment #17 from Dave Love <d.love@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #15) > >SuperLU (and all other supernodal packages) are closer to upstream if they are > > named as they are now. > > I agree. Also, 'repoquery' (or 'dnf') looks be not sensible to capitalized > names: Case-insensitive search seems sensible and useful to me. > repoquery --search SuperLU > or > repoquery --search superlu > > give same result. > > Ultimately, i vote for SuperLU, SuperLUMT, and SuperLUDIST (like upstream). > Waiting for Björn opinion. The author calls it SuperLU_DIST, and I'm Dave Love, not DaveLove. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx