https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398400 --- Comment #16 from Dave Love <d.love@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #14) > I interpret the guideline as also replacing underscores in the name with > dashes. Well, it's useless if it's not clear. I will try to get that sorted out. > The issue is that many projects are inconsistent (for example the tarball > name contains an underscore, but the web page a dash, etc.), so it's often > impossible to know a priori if the package will have a dash or an > underscore, and the guideline to always use dashes emerged to allow people > not to guess. If you can use the proper name of something (modulo case), you don't have to guess. > Aside from the name: > find -name \*.[oa] | xargs rm 2>/dev/null || true > → find -name \*.[oa] -delete Is using POSIX really a problem? > make → %make_build (to get parallelized build) Then you can't just (un)comment the smp flags according to whether it works or not. > > %{!?_licensedir:%global license %doc} > %_licensedir is now defined pretty much everywhere, so this is probably > unneeded. That's specifically necessary on the RHEL system I use with SCLs installed. $ rpm -q epel-rpm-macros epel-rpm-macros-6-15.noarch $ rpmbuild --showrc|grep licensedir $ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx