Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ruby-RMagick - Graphics Processing for Ruby and Ruby on Rails https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246716 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-07-13 13:25 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > *%define rubyabi 1.8 > Is this a hardrequires or is it possible to have someting like in python: There is surely some hack (some GLib users use the hack), it is rather complicated (because ruby is not included in minimum build environ) and I find the hack of little sense. NOTE: On rawhide, the hack you mentioned can no longer be used even for python because python is removed from minimum build environ > * why does this is needed : %define repoid 21576 ? This figure is needed for source URL, but I don't want to write the figure directly on URL because this id may change for different version. > * Why do you have BuildRequires: ruby and ruby-devel ? This type of BuildRequires frequently happens when BuildRequires target rpm ship -libs package (i.e. ruby-devel requires ruby-libs but does not require ruby itself). > * About # 1. First hack ImageMagick font configuration > Does this is a special tweak for RMagick or this could be > fixed in ImageMagick pacakge ? This can be fixed by ImageMagick side fix, however to file a bug against ImageMagick, I must explain and justify why the fix is needed against ImageMagick, and before it perhaps I must investigate ImageMagick code... (for now I can only say "after this fix RMagick works, don't know why it is needed in detail" So for now I fixed RMagick side. > build.log: > * Why theses dependencies aren't found ? > > checking for AdaptiveBlurImageChannel... no > checking for AdaptiveResizeImage... no This is because I build against ImageMagick and not against GraphicsMagick. From googling I have a impression that most user uses RMagick with ImageMagick. > * -doc > But do # 3. clean up is needed to prevent thoses files to be installed ? > Are > they installed in $(pwd)/Trash ? Why not to use instead (for -doc) > %doc Trash/* Simply my custom. For documentation I don't want to use installed files by make file because it is usually troublesome. > * naming - I don't know if this is mandatory but -docs is sometime choosen > instead of -doc for documentation sub-package... lftp ftp.kddilabs.jp:/Linux/packages/fedora/development/i386/os/Fedora> ls -al *-doc-* | wc -l 87 lftp ftp.kddilabs.jp:/Linux/packages/fedora/development/i386/os/Fedora> ls -al *-docs-* | wc -l 33 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review