https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383416 --- Comment #8 from Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to David Hannequin from comment #7) > Hi, > > * [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. > License field should have the correct name of the license, which in this > case is just `MIT` > (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:MIT?rd=Licensing/MIT). This will > also fix the rpmlint errors: > python3-influxdb.noarch: W: invalid-license MIT License > python2-influxdb.noarch: W: invalid-license MIT License > > I don't understand MIT licence seem valid. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing#Software_License_List and especially the "Short Name" column. In License tag this short name must be used, so not "MIT License" but just "MIT". -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx