https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1344276 Ken Dreyer <ktdreyer@xxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ktdreyer@xxxxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #4 from Ken Dreyer <ktdreyer@xxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Would you please address each of Parag's comments above and update the package to the latest upstream version? I'm a sponsor, so I can sponsor you if you would please do one satisfactory unofficial review of a package in Parag's links above, and ensure that this package gets cleaned up. For example, this sort of boilerplate seems common in the Gluster community and is unneeded: %define name gdeploy %define version 2.1 %define release 0 In fact it will break tools like rpmdev-bumpspec that Fedora rel-eng uses for mass rebuilds. It's better to simply define the values directly in the RPM: Name: gdeploy Version: 2.1 Release: 1%{?dist} The URL should be the upstream project, https://github.com/gluster/gdeploy, not Red Hat's storage website. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx