https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1388396 --- Comment #4 from Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> --- You can use %package doc Instead of %package -n python-%{pkg_name}-doc --------------- The docs generation tracebacks a lot, have a look at that and investigate please. --------------- The docs would be better generated with python 3 to show our love of Python 3, however, if that would be too complicated, just keep it as is. --------------- The links in /usr/bin should normally follow this pastern: less specific -> more specific I.e. the other way around than: /usr/bin/pynlpl-computepmi-3 /usr/bin/pynlpl-computepmi-3.5 -> /usr/bin/pynlpl-computepmi-3 /usr/bin/pynlpl-makefreqlist-3 /usr/bin/pynlpl-makefreqlist-3.5 -> /usr/bin/pynlpl-makefreqlist-3 /usr/bin/pynlpl-sampler-3 /usr/bin/pynlpl-sampler-3.5 -> /usr/bin/pynlpl-sampler-3 Also, in this case I would say just omit the Python version at all, as the version thing is there just to distinguish between the Python 2 and Python 3 executables and here the executables are only in Python 3 subpackage. --------------- I was quite curious, how it is possible that after %py3_install there is stuff in /usr/bin to move around and after %py2_install, there is none. So I've looked at the sources and it's explicitly only allowed on Python 3, so it works as expected. I recommend adding a comment after %py2_install, something like: # the executables are only installed on python 3 (by statement in setup.py) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx