https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373641 --- Comment #7 from Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael@xxxxxxx> --- > 3. Glad you've mentioned that. It's really odd to create a tiny subpackage (plus explicit dependencies!) for those few files only. Also note that this would inherit paths from the subpackage %name and store the %license file in /usr/share/licenses/setBfree-common/ instead of /usr/share/licenses/setBfree/ (and something similar for %doc). > Requires: lv2 >= 1.8.1 Preferably, that one would be arch-specific due to the lv2 base package being multilib. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Requiring_Base_Package -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx