https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350257 --- Comment #36 from Antonio Trande <anto.trande@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Dave Love from comment #35) > The fact that the check behaves differently in local mock, koji, and copr > suggests a real problem with undefined behaviour, which I think we should > worry about; I don't have time to debug it. Maybe orion has an opinion, as > he's watching? > > > Regarding the unused-direct-shlib-dependencys, I meant to find out why the > configured libraries aren't getting used, rather than just adding > --as-needed. It seems to be a build bug, but again I don't have time to > investigate. It's the sort of thing I might raise a bug report about as a > user of the package, and the packaging I did of older versions didn't have > this issue, e.g. metis is used. > > I didn't notice before that fftw isn't configured because there's no bcond > for it. It's an example of the conditionals being confusing when they don't > have an obvious purpose. Is there any reason not to build against fftw? PETSc needs fftw-mpi libraries; it does not work with fftw actually available on Fedora/EPEL. > > Also, I still don't understand the module file. The tests run (locally, for > me) > without it, so why is it needed? Sorry, which modules? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx