[Bug 1350257] Review Request: petsc - Portable Extensible Toolkit for Scientific Computation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350257



--- Comment #35 from Dave Love <d.love@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ---
The fact that the check behaves differently in local mock, koji, and copr
suggests a real problem with undefined behaviour, which I think we should worry
about; I don't have time to debug it.  Maybe orion has an opinion, as he's
watching?

There's still this:
     Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib64/gfortran,
     /usr/lib64/gfortran/modules

Regarding the unused-direct-shlib-dependencys, I meant to find out why the
configured libraries aren't getting used, rather than just adding --as-needed. 
It seems to be a build bug, but again I don't have time to investigate.  It's
the sort of thing I might raise a bug report about as a user of the package,
and the packaging I did of older versions didn't have this issue, e.g. metis is
used.

I didn't notice before that fftw isn't configured because there's no bcond for
it.  It's an example of the conditionals being confusing when they don't have
an obvious purpose.  Is there any reason not to build against fftw?

Also, I still don't understand the module file.  The tests run (locally, for
me) 
without it, so why is it needed?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]