https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290337 --- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo <puntogil@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Christoph Junghans from comment #2) > 3 questions: > - Does it make sense to install the javadoc without the actual package - > Missing "Require:"? No > [?]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. > Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in ed25519 > -java-javadoc Requires are handled by our: java(packages-)tools and this is a noarch package. for refrerences see: https://fedora-java.github.io/howto/latest/#maven > [?]: If package contains pom.xml files install it (including metadata) even > when building with ant > - pom.xml isn't packaged, why? is not true see "Provides" mvn(net.i2p.crypto:eddsa:pom:) > [?]: %check is present and all tests pass. > - There seem to be tests in test/net/i2p/crypto/eddsa, but no %check This is a maven build style and "%check" is useless only in this case (and with gradle) > Requires > -------- > ed25519-java (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): > java-headless > javapackages-tools > > ed25519-java-javadoc (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): > javapackages-tools > > > > Provides > -------- > ed25519-java: > ed25519-java > mvn(net.i2p.crypto:eddsa) > mvn(net.i2p.crypto:eddsa:pom:) > osgi(net.i2p.crypto.eddsa) > -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx