https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376635 Jon Ciesla <limburgher@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |limburgher@xxxxxxxxx Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |limburgher@xxxxxxxxx Flags| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla <limburgher@xxxxxxxxx> --- - rpmlint checks return: ostrichriders.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ostrichriders Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. Nice to have but not critical. - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license ( GPLv3+ ) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on devel (x86) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file So, it's just the things Andrea called out. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx