https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1336552 --- Comment #9 from Christoph Junghans <junghans@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski from comment #8) > Please post both spec and srpm URL each time you make a revision. See below > > Issues found in current revision: > > %install > [...] > cp %{S:1} %{S:2} %{buildroot}/%{_docdir}/%{name} Done > Could you take a look at the test suite output? It's showing diffs, but > there are apparently only whitespace differences because as far as I can > tell all the numbers are the same. The lines just came out in the wrong order, but the results match, patch added > > Please fix this rpmlint warning: > > exodusii-devel.x86_64: W: no-dependency-on exodusii/exodusii-libs/libexodusii Done > -doc subpackage should be noarch (BuildArch: noarch). Done > > Rpmlint (installed packages) > ---------------------------- > exodusii.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency > /usr/lib64/libexoIIv2c-5.14.0.so /lib64/libhdf5.so.10 > exodusii.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency > /usr/lib64/libexoIIv2c-5.14.0.so /lib64/libhdf5_hl.so.10 > exodusii.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency > /usr/lib64/libexoIIv2c-5.14.0.so /lib64/libz.so.1 > exodusii.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libexoIIv2c-5.14.0.so > exit@GLIBC_2.2.5 > exodusii.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency > /usr/lib64/libexoIIv2for-5.14.0.so /lib64/libnetcdf.so.11 > exodusii.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency > /usr/lib64/libexoIIv2for-5.14.0.so /lib64/libhdf5.so.10 > exodusii.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency > /usr/lib64/libexoIIv2for-5.14.0.so /lib64/libhdf5_hl.so.10 > exodusii.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency > /usr/lib64/libexoIIv2for-5.14.0.so /lib64/libz.so.1 > exodusii-devel.x86_64: W: no-dependency-on exodusii/exodusii-libs/libexodusii > > It looks like the libraries are linked to libhdf5 and libhdf5_hl > unnecessarily. That is, they don't seem to reference any symbols from > libhdf5*. Please verify and fix if necessary. How did you get these warning? I ran rpmlint before, but didn't see these. Anyhow, they linked against libz and libhdf5 to support static libs, which we don't build. Fix that over-linking bug > README is packaged twice (once in main package and second time in -doc). Done Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/junghans/fedora-review/master/exodusii/exodusii.spec SRPM URL: https://github.com/junghans/fedora-review/raw/master/exodusii/exodusii-6.02-3.fc24.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx