https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1336552 --- Comment #8 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <dominik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Please post both spec and srpm URL each time you make a revision. Issues found in current revision: %install [...] cp %{S:1} %{S:2} %{buildroot}/%{_docdir}/%{name} please use either cp -p or install -p here. (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Timestamps) Could you take a look at the test suite output? It's showing diffs, but there are apparently only whitespace differences because as far as I can tell all the numbers are the same. Please fix this rpmlint warning: exodusii-devel.x86_64: W: no-dependency-on exodusii/exodusii-libs/libexodusii This is actually mandated by the guidelines (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Requiring_Base_Package). -doc subpackage should be noarch (BuildArch: noarch). Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- exodusii.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libexoIIv2c-5.14.0.so /lib64/libhdf5.so.10 exodusii.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libexoIIv2c-5.14.0.so /lib64/libhdf5_hl.so.10 exodusii.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libexoIIv2c-5.14.0.so /lib64/libz.so.1 exodusii.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libexoIIv2c-5.14.0.so exit@GLIBC_2.2.5 exodusii.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libexoIIv2for-5.14.0.so /lib64/libnetcdf.so.11 exodusii.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libexoIIv2for-5.14.0.so /lib64/libhdf5.so.10 exodusii.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libexoIIv2for-5.14.0.so /lib64/libhdf5_hl.so.10 exodusii.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libexoIIv2for-5.14.0.so /lib64/libz.so.1 exodusii-devel.x86_64: W: no-dependency-on exodusii/exodusii-libs/libexodusii It looks like the libraries are linked to libhdf5 and libhdf5_hl unnecessarily. That is, they don't seem to reference any symbols from libhdf5*. Please verify and fix if necessary. README is packaged twice (once in main package and second time in -doc). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx