[Bug 1350257] Review Request: petsc - Portable Extensible Toolkit for Scientific Computation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350257



--- Comment #23 from Dave Love <d.love@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #22)
> > I don't think the /usr/share/petsc*/conf directories should be in the
> > main packages (or even in the -devel ones?)
> > 
> 
> Do you think that modules and conf are useless?

I'd like to avoid the module, but th file that is used lives in
/etc/modulefiles.
The other files there don't seem to be connected with running the library.
How are they used?

> 
> > I still don't understand the SETOPT_FLAGS thing, which definitely
> > isn't necessary, and why flags are set separately (and differently?)
> > at compile- and run-time.  None of that seems to be necessary.
> > 
> 
> Configure does not like -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE flag. I set SETOPT_FLAGS in order
> to indulge a specific test.
> Only Make flags are effectively used for building.

What are the actual errors you get, and how does it help to define an invalid
macro name (which I'd expect to give an error)?  I said those bits don't seem
to be necessary because I'd removed them and built the package OK for epel and
fedora.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]