https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366047 --- Comment #7 from lo1@xxxxxxxxxx --- (In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #6) > > Given that there are 95 executables under the %{_bindir} in this case, do we still want to explicitlly list all files? > > In this case %{_bindir}/tss* would be a reasonable compromise. > And there's only two files in %{_libdir}/, so they should be listed > explicitly: > > %files > %{_bindir}/tss* > %{_libdir}/libtss.so.0 > %{_libdir}/libtss.so.0.* > > As an additional advantage, this protects against accidental so version > bumps (which are forbidden in stable releases). That makes perfect sense. Thank you! Vicky -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx