[Bug 1366047] Review Request: tss2 - IBM's TSS 2.0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366047



--- Comment #6 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> ---
> Given that there are 95 executables under the %{_bindir} in this case, do we still want to explicitlly list all files?

In this case %{_bindir}/tss* would be a reasonable compromise.
And there's only two files in %{_libdir}/, so they should be listed explicitly:

%files
%{_bindir}/tss*
%{_libdir}/libtss.so.0
%{_libdir}/libtss.so.0.*

As an additional advantage, this protects against accidental so version bumps
(which are forbidden in stable releases).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]