[Bug 1358293] Review Request: bcg729 - Opensource implementation of the G.729 codec

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1358293



--- Comment #2 from Sandro Mani <manisandro@xxxxxxxxx> ---
>> # Fix FSF addresses
> don't do that, just report bug in upstream and note link somewhere around License tag.
Any particular reason? In the past, I've been instructed to fix the FSF addr.
>From my understanding, it also makes sense - or does this violate "shipping a
license file different from upstream" in you opinion? Now whether this needs to
be done with seds or with a huge patch is another issue, but plenty of packages
are doing this.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]