https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356048 --- Comment #15 from Antonio Trande <anto.trande@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Jaroslav Škarvada from comment #12) > (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #11) > > Why it should provide its own license file? The docs are licensing under the > same license as the main package and it's dependent on the main package, > from the doc: > > > Both this document and the RLTSDR Scanner is licensed under the GNU General > > Public License version 3 (http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html). > > According to [1]: > > If a subpackage is dependent (either implicitly or explicitly) upon a base > > package (where a base package is defined as a resulting binary package from the > > same source RPM which contains the appropriate license texts as %license), > > it is not necessary for that subpackage to also include those license > > texts as %license. Ah sorry, I didn't seen the dependency. But does it really need main package? > > Well, I have now a dilemma, whether the resulting license is GPLv3 or GPLv3+ > as stated on the different place of the sources. I took the documentation as > more authoritative source and fixed the resulting license to be GPLv3, but I > will query upstream about their intention. > > [1] > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging: > LicensingGuidelines#Subpackage_Licensing They should not be dependent among them and should have different License tags in any case. - Does not work for me: $ rtlsdr_scan Import error: No module named rtlsdrtcp Error importing libraries Press [Return] to exit -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx