https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186 Rick Tierney <rick.tierney@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(nhorman@xxxxxxxxx | |m) --- Comment #36 from Rick Tierney <rick.tierney@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Rick Tierney from comment #35) > Neil: > > My bad, the last message I posted was misleading. Library jars MUST remain > present in order for the application to run! We cannot remove the jars from > the binary RPM otherwise opa-fmgui won't work at all. > > So given that critical information, the questions become: > > 1. Does Fedora have any rules against this type of 3rd Party jar file usage? > > 2. Are the 3rd Party licenses for the jar files required when using them > this way? > > 3. Where should the 3rd Party licenses be stored? RPM, SRPM, both? Perhaps I'm not being completely clear... these jar files contain binary .class files which contribute to the proper execution of the opa-fmgui application. NONE of these jar files (including gritty.jar) contain source code, and I'm wondering if they need to be accompanied by license files. The Gritty source code is a separate issue, and since it is not packaged separately we are building that ourselves and it is accompanied by a license file. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx