[Bug 1323186] Review Request: opa-fmgui - Intel OPA Fabric GUI

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186

Rick Tierney <rick.tierney@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Attachment|0                           |1
        #1162001 is|                            |
           obsolete|                            |



--- Comment #31 from Rick Tierney <rick.tierney@xxxxxxxxx> ---
Created attachment 1162275
  --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1162275&action=edit
opa-fmgui spec file

So am I to understand that if we are not including the source code for a 3rd
party library (except gritty) and just pulling them in via BuildRequires, then
we don't need to include the license files anywhere (neither RPM nor SRPM)?

Incidentally, I tagged all the license files with %license about an hour ago. 
But they reside in the lib/ folder with jar files instead of the
/usr/share/doc/license subdirectory.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]