https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186 Neil Horman <nhorman@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(nhorman@xxxxxxxxx | |m) | |needinfo?(nhorman@xxxxxxxxx | |m) | --- Comment #30 from Neil Horman <nhorman@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Thank you. Regarding the license files, I'm not 100% sure what to do in this case. I did note that they needed to be updated to reflect the distibuting choice of license previously, but that was before I understood that you weren't actually using them. Given that, it seems safe to not change them in any way. I suppose the most sane action would be to simply not include the source for those libraries in the upstream project at all, because you'll pull them in via rpm dependencies. Then you know you don't need to mess with their licenses at all, because you won't need to include them Additionally a minor nit, The license files should be tagged as %license in the spec file so that they get dropped in the /usr/share/doc/license subdirectory. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx