[Bug 1323186] Review Request: opa-fmgui - Intel OPA Fabric GUI

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186

Rick Tierney <rick.tierney@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|                            |needinfo?



--- Comment #23 from Rick Tierney <rick.tierney@xxxxxxxxx> ---
Neil:

1) I have reduced the number of rpmlint errors in my binary RPM to those shown
below. As you can see the first 3 are out of my control because there are 3
third-party-libraries that have the wrong address for the Free Software
Foundation. Am I supposed to elevate this issue to the upstream? 

rpmlint -i opa-fmgui-10.0.0.0.3-1.fc25.noarch.rpm

opa-fmgui.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/java/fmgui/lib/gritty_license.txt
The Free Software Foundation address in this file seems to be outdated or
misspelled.  Ask upstream to update the address, or if this is a license file,
possibly the entire file with a new copy available from the FSF.

opa-fmgui.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/java/fmgui/lib/jfreechart_license.txt
The Free Software Foundation address in this file seems to be outdated or
misspelled.  Ask upstream to update the address, or if this is a license file,
possibly the entire file with a new copy available from the FSF.

opa-fmgui.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/java/fmgui/lib/hibernate_license.txt
The Free Software Foundation address in this file seems to be outdated or
misspelled.  Ask upstream to update the address, or if this is a license file,
possibly the entire file with a new copy available from the FSF.

opa-fmgui.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary fmgui
Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page.

Still working on a solution for this...
opa-fmgui.noarch: W: class-path-in-manifest /usr/share/java/fmgui/fmgui.jar
The META-INF/MANIFEST.MF file in the jar contains a hardcoded Class-Path.
These entries do not work with older Java versions and even if they do work,
they are inflexible and usually cause nasty surprises.

1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 2 warnings.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


2) For the licensecheck in the fmgui/ folder after installation I have a few
files that don't include the license header (See below).  Is that required for
every file?

licensecheck -r fmgui

fmgui/util/fmguiclear.sh: *No copyright* UNKNOWN
fmgui/util/postsetup.sh: *No copyright* UNKNOWN
fmgui/README: *No copyright* GENERATED FILE
fmgui/THIRD-PARTY-README: *No copyright* UNKNOWN
fmgui/help/LICENSE: BSD (3 clause)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]