[Bug 1242056] Review Request: rubygem-chake - serverless configuration management tool for chef

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242056



--- Comment #9 from Athos Ribeiro <athoscribeiro@xxxxxxxxx> ---
Hello, sorry for leaving this open for so much time, I have been really busy
with my masters degree. I am able to be back contributing and am working on
other packages as well.

> You are doing very fine. But the 2 reviews were a bit too
> weak. I suggest doing a review of some ruby related
> package, so that you would better show your knowledge.

New reviews on the way.

> 
> I believe it is almost done about review, but I will ask
> you, to send an email to fedora-devel, or any ruby SIG,
> for an explanation of the files
> /usr/share/gems/doc/chake-0.7/rdoc/fonts/*.ttf
> these files apparently are from
> $ rpm -ql rubygem-rdoc|grep ttf
> /usr/share/gems/gems/rdoc-4.2.0/lib/rdoc/generator/template/darkfish/fonts/
> Lato-Light.ttf
> /usr/share/gems/gems/rdoc-4.2.0/lib/rdoc/generator/template/darkfish/fonts/
> Lato-LightItalic.ttf
> /usr/share/gems/gems/rdoc-4.2.0/lib/rdoc/generator/template/darkfish/fonts/
> Lato-Regular.ttf
> /usr/share/gems/gems/rdoc-4.2.0/lib/rdoc/generator/template/darkfish/fonts/
> Lato-RegularItalic.ttf
> /usr/share/gems/gems/rdoc-4.2.0/lib/rdoc/generator/template/darkfish/fonts/
> SourceCodePro-Bold.ttf
> /usr/share/gems/gems/rdoc-4.2.0/lib/rdoc/generator/template/darkfish/fonts/
> SourceCodePro-Regular.ttf
> 
> and there are several policies about fonts in fedora,
> and these being duplicates is not good. See
> 
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:
> Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_fonts_in_other_packages
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:FontsPolicy#Package_layout_for_fonts

As you can see here http://paste.fedoraproject.org/369093/46379839/ and here
http://paste.fedoraproject.org/369092/63798193/raw/, this generated font files
are replicated in 526 other rubygem packages. I did ask in #fedora-ruby about
it and they told me there's a ticket open about this issue, and this may not be
the best thing to do, but since these are generated files, it's ok.

Here are new files with upstream latest version:
Spec URL: https://ribeiro.fedorapeople.org/rubygem-chake.spec
SRPM URL: https://ribeiro.fedorapeople.org/rubygem-chake-0.13-4.fc25.src.rpm
COPR build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/ribeiro/tests/build/316493/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]