https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324590 --- Comment #41 from paul.j.reger@xxxxxxxxx --- Given that this review was going so slowly, we had two meetings this morning with: Intel: Ira Weiny, John Fleck, Russ McGuire, and me. Redhat: Michal Schmidt In the meeting we clarified what we were doing, and we decided a different approach. Goal: obtain approval of the spec file and other packaging issues for the unreleased 10.1 PSM code, that is a work in progress. The 10.1 release will probably happen in 8 weeks time frame. This review will be done in parallel with other activities to get 10.1 released such as validation efforts, and any last minute changes that ripple due to the hfi1 driver being reviewed at kernel.org. How this work will be done: 1. I have put all of our master branch code work into the 10.1 branch at github: https://github.com/01org/opa-psm2/tree/10.1 This code is complete as far as I can tell. Sorry in advance for any problems that I left. 2. Redhat should review what I have there, and indicate comments here. Please pull that branch, and 'make dist', and that should create a specfile and tarball for you to review. The tarball is suitable for use with 'rpmbuild -ta <tarbalfile>'. 3. Note: I have already placed a copy of the current tarball at: https://github.com/01org/opa-psm2/releases/download/10_1/libpsm2-10.1.1.tar.gz which should enable testing by redhat. 4. I will fix problems found by redhat, and push changes to the 10.1 branch on github. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx