https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323181 --- Comment #2 from Marek Goldmann <mgoldman@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #1) > See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Git_Hosting_Services > for a nicer way to specify Source URL that gives an archive with a better > name. That's cool, although I'll stay with what I have currently :) > Why do you provide both /usr/bin/docker-squash3 and /usr/bin/docker-squash? > Do they provide different functionality? If not, only one should be > provided. If both implementations are equivalent, implementation in python3 > is preferred > [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#Executables_in_.2Fusr. > 2Fbin]. Nope, the functionality is the same. For sure I want to maintain the same spec file across all Fedora's and EPEL 7, so I'll see what can I do. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx