Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-widgetTools-1.12.0-2 - Tools to support the construction of tcltk widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241081 ------- Additional Comments From pingoufc4@xxxxxxxx 2007-06-25 17:24 EST ------- E: R-widgetTools only-non-binary-in-usr-lib For this remark I asked spot at that time and he told me that it was not possible to avoid this complaint with some package. But maybe there is a trick that I do not know to avoid it... None of the documentation files under R/library/widgetTools show up as doc files in the final package. I don't know if this is a problem; it depends on whether the package will still function if those files are deleted. For this point, R is using a graphical interface on which you can see the different libraries that are set up for the program (that why there is the %post). Based on the spec of R-Matrix - R module ( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241052 ) I have changed the %doc section to avoid this redundancy If you agree on these change then I will change my other spec file. SPEC : http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-widgetTools/R-widgetTools.spec SRPM : http://pingoured.dyndns.org/public/RPM/R-widgetTools/R-widgetTools-1.12.0-3.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review