Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: R-widgetTools-1.12.0-2 - Tools to support the construction of tcltk widgets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241081 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx 2007-06-24 15:14 EST ------- This package looks pretty good to me, but I don't really know much about R so there are a few questions to which we'll need to work out answers. First, the lone rpmlint complaint: E: R-widgetTools only-non-binary-in-usr-lib There are no noarch R packages in the distro, so I'm not sure if this is acceptable or if it's even possible to put these under /usr/share and have R find them. Does R have a a search path for modules or will it only look in _libdir? Now, some concerns about documentation: The files you list as %doc end up being packaged twice, once under R/library/widgetT9ools and once under /usr/share/doc. None of the documentation files under R/library/widgetTools show up as doc files in the final package. I don't know if this is a problem; it depends on whether the package will still function if those files are deleted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review