https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1312015 --- Comment #7 from Raphael Groner <projects.rg@xxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to jiri vanek from comment #6) … > Which is the one who build. "Java packages MUST BuildRequire their respective build system" and that means for me that we also have to use it *correctly*, what else sense would that sentence have? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#BuildRequires_and_Requires > I call "ant" and then I pack the classes with > fresh manifest by java -jar. What better can i do? Sure. But the ant run does the "pack" for you inclusively. So why do it a second time and how to handle future upstream changes? It shouldn't be of any relevance if you are upstream as well or not. Hmm okay, it's becoming more a philosophical question on that level of discussion. > That is standard netbeans-project build. I doubt it is handed differently > somewhere else. And if it is, then all NB projects I ever packed, Are wrong. No idea what you did in past and general internals of netbeans build process. It does not matter for a right review, we've to concentrate on guidelines and those chnage over time as well. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review