https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318363 --- Comment #3 from Sopot Cela <scela@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Spec URL:https://sopotc.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-epp-logging/eclipse-epp-logging.spec SRPM URL: https://sopotc.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-epp-logging/eclipse-epp-logging-1.100.0-0.2.gitc6ce9f2.fc23.src.rpm I filed an upstream bug regarding the missing license headers https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=489926 . I am not building or shipping neither the tests or the examples artifacts. Is it ok to leave them in the tarball for now? Once upstream updates them, I'll make sure to update the tarball. About the "Cannot find license.html in rpm(s)" - the license text is generated by the "eclipse-license" package and is included at build-time in each feature. This is why no license text is included in the git repo. So for example, it is included in the binary rpms here: /usr/share/eclipse/droplets/epp-logging/eclipse/features/org.eclipse.epp.logging.aeri.feature_*/license.html . -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review