https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292040 --- Comment #13 from Antonio Trande <anto.trande@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski from comment #12) > (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #11) > > Package Review > > ============== > > > > Legend: > > [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated > > [ ] = Manual review needed > > > > ==== Issues ==== > > > > - Please, use %{_pkgdocdir} or %doc macro for documentation files. > > I don't understand what you mean here. The spec already does this: > %files doc > %{_pkgdocdir} > > -doc sub-package should provide its own license file; inside it, I guess you can tag all documentation with %doc without making a %{buildroot}%{_defaultdocdir}/tng directory. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review