https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317939 --- Comment #4 from Benji Wiebe <benjiwiebe14@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #3) > But %description should be a bit longer: what can you do with this package, > what is the output, is special hardware required, etc. Doesn't have to be > exhaustive, one paragraph is enough. It is a *bit* longer...I hope that's good enough. > During review it is customary to bump the revision after major changes, > add stuff to %changelog, and upload the SRPM under a new name. The > spec file is updated in place. OK, I'll do that from now on. > I meant rpm package ownership. Your package creates those directories so it > should own them. Aha, I caught on about RPM ownership. I uninstalled dump1090 on my PC, and the directories are still there. I fixed that now. > Hm, I don't remember what those were. That's why it's helpful to keep > old srpms accessible. They were rtl-sdr and libusb. Both are picked up automatically by RPM. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review