https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1306258 --- Comment #7 from T. Orsava <torsava@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda from comment #6) > (In reply to T. Orsava from comment #4) > > (In reply to Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda from comment #2) > > > You probably don't want to mark PKG-INFO as %doc. Since it's in the > > > .egg-info directory, some other software may use it for processing metadata > > > about the package. Thus if someone installed the package without docs (`rpm > > > -i --excludedocs`), the package might appear broken. > > > > There are two PKG-INFO files, one in the .egg-info directory, and one in the > > root directory. I believe the second one can (and should?) be included in > > %doc. > > Ah, this one. Sorry, that can be marked as %doc. I'm not sure if it should, > though. It seems that most of the information it provides is already > available in RPM metadata and some other info will probably not be that > interesting to normal users. Since there'll be PKG-INFO in the package > anyway, I'd probably not include this one. > I think this is a matter of taste, so I'll let you do the final decision and > just leave my "-0" here. Ok in that case my apologies to Charalampos for suggesting he makes it so. Also for future reference, we found out that the ".gitignore.in" file pointed out by a lint warning should NOT be tampered with as it is actually integral to the working of the package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review