https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302809 --- Comment #6 from Antonio Trande <anto.trande@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Petr Šabata from comment #5) > (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #4) > > (In reply to Petr Šabata from comment #3) > > > (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #1) > > > > - Very short name; can you consider to use 'ne-editor' as package name? > > > Hmm, I'm curious -- why is this an issue? > > > > It's not mandatory. If you prefer use a '2-letter' name I think there is not > > any rule that prevents this choice. > > Even if I don't remember any package with name so short on Fedora. > > Well, that doesn't really answer my question why you think it's strange or > bad. > It's not strange neither bad, just not easily recognizable during a searching. Who does not know 'ne', can easily understand what it is already by '-editor' suffix. That is my thought of course. > And just to name a few from the top of my head -- at, mc, nc, ii, jj, st, > xz, bc, ... :) Indeed, there are there. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review