https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302809 --- Comment #5 from Petr Šabata <psabata@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #4) > (In reply to Petr Šabata from comment #3) > > (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #1) > > > - Very short name; can you consider to use 'ne-editor' as package name? > > Hmm, I'm curious -- why is this an issue? > > It's not mandatory. If you prefer use a '2-letter' name I think there is not > any rule that prevents this choice. > Even if I don't remember any package with name so short on Fedora. Well, that doesn't really answer my question why you think it's strange or bad. And just to name a few from the top of my head -- at, mc, nc, ii, jj, st, xz, bc, ... :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review