[Bug 1302003] Review Request: mongo-java-driver2 - MongoDB Java driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302003

Christos Triantafyllidis <christos.triantafyllidis@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+



--- Comment #13 from Christos Triantafyllidis <christos.triantafyllidis@xxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #12)
> (In reply to Christos Triantafyllidis from comment #11)
> > (In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #10)
> > > (In reply to Christos Triantafyllidis from comment #9)
> > > > I'm not sure how to test this. Would it be possible to provide a test case?
> > > > I'd like to run a simple test run especially given the fact that %check is
> > > > not included.
> > > maven build style not use and do not need the %check section
> > 
> > I understand that this may not be used but I have no way to ensure that this
> > package actually does what it is supposed to do. Is there a simple unit test
> > I can use to cross-check it? If that requires mongo servers etc that is
> > something that I cannot test.
> 
> MongoDB stuff in this case is useless, we can't run test suite

Agreed.

> 
> > > > [!]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
> > > >      Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in mongo-
> > > >      java-driver2-javadoc
> > > 
> > > No needed is a noarch package
> > 
> > Not sure how the build arch relates to that. That more or less means that
> > whenever the mongo-java-driver2-javadoc it should pull mongo-java-driver2
> > too.
> 
> Both packages are noarch. Why i should use ISA notation? No have sense for me
> 
The ISA notation is not the point here. The point was that
mongo-java-driver2-javadoc doesn't have mongo-java-driver2 in its requires. I
checked again the mongo-java-driver-javadoc and I see that this is not the case
for it too so we can skip that too.

> > > > 
> > > > I also see that compared to the original package the following subpackages
> > > > are missing:
> > > > mongo-java-driver2-bson
> > > > mongo-java-driver2-bson-javadoc
> > > not needed
> > 
> > Does this package provide also the bson package functionality? If not then
> > it won't be a 100% compat package. Excuse the fact that I have minimal java
> > knowledge, does that mean that no-one would ever need those bson subpackages?
> 
> Original mongo-java-driver spec file use ant build style, and split the
> library in two artifacts. With maven both libraries are contained in the
> same JAR file
> As compact package this work fine, for me.
> 

Agreed. Thanks for clarifying.

I'm marking the review as completed.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]