[Bug 212984] Review Request: hunspell-ar - Arabic word list/dictionaries for OpenOffice

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: hunspell-ar  - Arabic word list/dictionaries for OpenOffice


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212984


kevin@xxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




------- Additional Comments From kevin@xxxxxxxxx  2007-06-20 00:26 EST -------

OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
See below - Spec file matches base package name.
OK - Spec has consistant macro usage.
OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines.
OK - License (GPL)
OK - License field in spec matches
OK - License file included in package
OK - Spec in American English
OK - Spec is legible.
OK - Sources match upstream md5sum:
28c3b7dce962051d55b23ac5e51f264b  ./buckwalter_morphan_1_hunspell_patch.tar.gz
28c3b7dce962051d55b23ac5e51f264b  ./buckwalter_morphan_1_hunspell_patch.tar.gz.1
b3ccdcacb32e57e2653f3e16de707a3e  ./buckwalter2unicode.py
b3ccdcacb32e57e2653f3e16de707a3e  ./buckwalter2unicode.py.1
OK - BuildRequires correct
OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.
OK - Package has a correct %clean section.
OK - Package has correct buildroot
OK - Package is code or permissible content.
OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime.
OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install

OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch.
OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files.
OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own.
OK - Package owns all the directories it creates.
OK - No rpmlint output.
OK - final provides and requires are sane:

SHOULD Items:

OK - Should build in mock.
OK - Should build on all supported archs
OK - Should have dist tag
OK - Should package latest version

Issues:

1. The base source file doesn't match this package name, but it matches up with the
other hunspell dicts, so this is not an issue.

2. I was thinking the version didn't look right, but after checking the possible
options I think this will be ok, at least I can't see any better option with the
way upstream names releases.

So, no blockers I can see, so this is re-APPROVED.
Sorry for the delay and detour here.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]