https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288456 --- Comment #8 from Pavel Alexeev <pahan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Julien Enselme from comment #7) > > Why binaries placed ony in python3 package? > > The python2 and python3 binaries should work the same. According to the > guidelines, I may add them in only one package, the python3 one if possible. > I can add them for python2 if you wish. No. According to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#Executables_in_.2Fusr.2Fbin you indeed may package version built by any version of python untill it provide same functionality. But it should be placed in python-recommonmark, nor python2-recommonmark nor python3-recommonmark. Please see python-pygments provided as example in guidelines. > > [!]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel > > You must require both > > I do: I have the BuildRequires: python2-devel in the python 2 subpackage > and BuildRequires: python3-devel in the python3 one. I'm not sure there, but example list it also in main package: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#Example_common_spec_file Possible you are right and it may be equal... Is not? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review