Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: msmtp - an SMTP client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243631 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus@xxxxxxx 2007-06-19 17:15 EST ------- Three comments (not blockers) I personally disagree with Manuel about providing MTA, since I think that it is double with providing /usr/sbin/sendmail Not a big deal. I think that it would be better to have ntlm support. It is not an obligation, if you don't want to, don't do it, but then you should rebuild gsasl if somebody else submit it (and gsasl is accepted, of course :) Regarding using the alternative mechanism like ssmtp and esmtp do, I think it really should be left to your judgment. Although I do it in esmtp I don't think it is particularly right. The main reason why I do it is because it is a requires for mutt. But maybe it should be mutt that should be changed... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review