https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295710 Petr Pisar <ppisar@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW Flags|fedora-review? | --- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar <ppisar@xxxxxxxxxx> --- The URL and Source address are usable. Ok. Source0 archive is original (SHA-256: c4c77fd279aab6ea56d5b34d2f17a31c59ebe5933a2002d25916ef082bcc008f). Ok. Summary verified from README. Ok. Description verified from README. Ok. FIX: The license tag (GPL+) is wrong. For example README states "GPL v2", COPYRIGHT states GPLv2+. Or wml_aux/txt2html/LICENSE is BSD. And then there is a bunch of bundled libraries, like 15 years copy of pcre in wml_backend/p2_mp4h/pcre/ that is (BSD or GPLv2). Actually I'm giving up this review until the libraries will be unbundled (and their files pruned in the %prep section to make sure the bundled code is not used). See COPYRIGHT.OTHER for incomplete list of them. Many of them are dozen years old frozen copies. This is rely example how not to program and to package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review