https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1263941 --- Comment #12 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@xxxxx> --- * Named correctly * Versioned correctly * Packaging the latest version * License good for fedora * rpmlint mostly happy (see below) * Builds fine in mock * Dependencies sane * Fileslist sane * SPEC file clean and legible 0.) License tag not correct > License: GPLv2 It seems to be "GPLv2+" (there's an or later version clause). 1.) Please add comments that would describe the upstreaming status of the patches > Patch0: tayga-0.9.2_redhat_initscripts_and_systemd.patch > Patch1: tayga-0.9.2_cflags_override.patch Have you send them upstream? Is there a mailing list or bug tracker reference? 2.) Why do you turn off PIE on ppc64? > # PIE hardening seems to fail on ppc64 If this is really the case, please add a more descriptive comment (error output). 3.) You're missing the %defattr tag It's not needed for current RPM, but seems like you're targetting old RHEL versions as well? 4.) You're installing a service with name of a templated service: > ln -s %{_unitdir}/%{name}@.service %{buildroot}%{_unitdir}/%{name}@example.service This makes no sense. systemd would probably just ignore that. 'systemctl enable tayga@example' would make the link in the proper place; just drop that line. 5.) rpmlint complains: > tayga.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/licenses/tayga/COPYING > The Free Software Foundation address in this file seems to be outdated or > misspelled. Ask upstream to update the address, or if this is a license file, > possibly the entire file with a new copy available from the FSF. This is something the upstream would need to fix; you may want to let them know. Obviously not a review blocker. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review