https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282893 Dave Love <d.love@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |d.love@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #10 from Dave Love <d.love@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Created attachment 1107142 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1107142&action=edit fix requires I looked at this, as I had an earlier version in copr (not suitable for review). The questions might well not be appropriate, but I think it would help to have notes in the spec. * It won't install because it requires an arch-specific -common package; patch attached. * I'd have thought iotk should be unbundled, but I don't know if it's of more general use. * Shouldn't this build against atlas or lapack/blas on non-x86? (ppc64le seems a plausible architecture to run it on.) I know that makes it particularly suffer the BLAS mess in Fedora, but scalapack links against reference blas anyhow. * It's not using the default compilation and linking flags (not that I agree with that requirement for computational programs). * Will smp make not work? There's no comment, and the build takes a while. * Why not use elpa? (I haven't tried with this version and the Fedora elpa.) * Shouldn't the doc be installed? * Would the GUI be useful? (I don't know.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review