[Bug 244374] Review Request: xulrunner - XUL Runner

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: xulrunner - XUL Runner


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244374





------- Additional Comments From panemade@xxxxxxxxx  2007-06-18 04:57 EST -------
(In reply to comment #8)
> >Don't add static libraries files. If you want then
> >- MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
> >check files installed under %{_libdir}/xulrunner-%{version}%{prerelease}/sdk
> 
> To clarify, these are not just static versions of the dynamic libraries. They
> are required if you want to link against lixpcom.so, at compile time or at
> runtime. That's why I thought I'd put them in the -devel package.
> 
> http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/XPCOM_Glue
> 
> That said, should I use a -static package even in this case?

Its OK then. Let it be in -devel rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]